FAA ranks near bottom in Government employee morale

http://bestplacestowork.org/BPTW/rankings/

http://bestplacestowork.org/BPTW/rankings/agency.php?code=TD00&q=scores_large

Pay particular attention to the employee satisfaction scores
involving "White" employees and "African-American" employees
and people over 40 in the Federal Aviation Administration.

The FAA ranks near the bottom in almost every category in
Federal Service unless you are Black. As an ex-FAA employee
I know why. They treat critical employees like controllers
and technicians like **** while they "Kiss the Black Ass"
and cater to diversity conferences at resort casinos.

Would it not make sense that a Government agency responsible
for millions of lives EVERY ****ING DAY should rank near the
top?

Should a Government agency that is responsible for BILLIONS
of revenue EACH day be near the TOP or BOTTOM?

Why are minorities so much more happy in the FAA??
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm???

Why is Diversity and "Kissing the Black Ass" more important
now in the Federal AVIATION Administration?

Anybody got an answer?

DOT and FAA rank near bottom

"Kissing the Black Ass" is coming at an extremely high price
and at the risk of millions of the flying public.

Unhappy FAA Employee=Delays=Aluminum Shower=Death

http://bestplacestowork.org/BPTW/rankings/agency.php?code=TD03&q=scores_subcomponent

African-American? No, They are an American first so American-African. Now if
they were bourn in Africa and become a legal alien here they would be an
African-American. Anyone bourn whithin these borders is actualy a Native
American! Now the old slaves were true African-Americans anyone bourn after
they were already brought here is a American-African.

13th. Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment
for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist
within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate
legislation.

Washington State Department of Corrections Private Sector Partnerships
Latest Advertisements,

"Are you experiencing high employee turnover? Worried about the costs of
employee benefits? Unhappy with out-of-state or offshore suppliers? Getting
hit by overseas competition? Having trouble motivating your workforce?
Thinking about expansion space? Then Washington State Department of
Corrections Private Sector Partnerships is for you."

UNICOR = http://www.unicor.gov is Federal Prison Industries, Inc

What everyone need's to do especialy the American-African community is wake
up and realize that there aren't 2+ million people in prison to "make the
country safe." They're there to provide a service for almost nothing in
substandard conditions - their labor. Let's call them what they are: slaves.

And we think china is Wrong for doing this hahahahaha happning right here!

U.S.A. = Underprivileged Slaves of America

Also Watch It they are trying to make us have permission to fly our side the
United States!!!! Further Enslaving The American Population!!!

Source: Baja Bush Pilots (I am a Member)

Alert 1 (9/17/07)
Critical Alert.. Proposed Major Changes Regarding Borders Crossings (both
ways)

(As the BBP understands it)

In a major rule change request, Homeland Security is proposing changes that
will have a dramatic impact on all private aircraft crossing to and from
foreign destinations including Canada, Mexico, and the Caribbean. Their
proposal includes the requirement to provide full information of pilot and
all passengers 60 minutes prior to departure from any foreign country to the
US as well as waiting for permission back from them prior to departing that
country.

This request must be provided by electronic means i.e. the Internet.

And, this also applies to departing the US. Again, a full list of all
aboard 60 minutes before departure and permission prior to takeoff when
flying out of the US to a foreign destination.

We believe in the concept if it helps national security however, this rule
will be all but impossible to conform to. It is hard enough to get a
working phone to call FSS and Customs direct leave alone an Internet
connection to request permission from Homeland and then wait for an e-mail
back from Homeland for permission prior to departing.

Based on their numbers, there are 138,000 aircraft which crossed the border
in 2006. As you must request permission both ways and they use an average
of 3 persons per aircraft, they will have to do a background check on
831,354 persons a year or, 2,335 persons every day. (that would be 778
aircraft a day). If implemented, I see hours of backlog with pilots and
passengers waiting hours for permission at an Internet terminal somewhere in
a foreign country.

The BBP urgently requests that every pilot / passenger that crosses any
foreign border take a hard look at the attached proposed rule change and
make an official comment. We would urge all to recommend that Homeland
Security contact myself at the BBP office so that we can discuss logistics
that could work. We believe that the rule maker who wrote this proposal
really does not have working knowledge of communication (or lack thereof) in
Canada, Mexico, and the Caribbean.
Please remember that all comments will be public knowledge and that these
comments will be posted and accessible to anyone with Internet access.

Homeland Security carries a big hammer and gets almost anything they want.
This is going to be a tough one to win and we expect major changes to come
down. However, with our input, we hope that the proposal can be changed to
be workable. And, if the US gets these kind of rules implemented, what
would happen in Mexico, etc. imposed the same rules for border crossing.

If enacted as written, this proposed rule change could all but destroy
tourism via private aircraft in all countries including Mexico and Central
America.

It is critical that all read it and respond to the docket officially. It is
your responsibility to insure that your feelings are heard on this important
subject. We will provide more Alerts as we learn more.

____________________________

Alert 2 (9/18/07)
Critical notification information Alert

We have been in contact with Homeland Security and they have given us more
information as to what is needed for comments as well as how and where to
send this information. See the Alert on the home page.
Support in this subject is critical. We had 1,000 members read this Alert
yesterday. All 1,000 need to reply as well as we need to get the other
3,000 members to join in. We are requesting that all flying groups copy and
send these critical Alerts to all their members.

In talking to Homeland Security, there are several points that must be made:

That numbers count. They are not looking for long statements. 100 short
statements make a lot more impact then 10 long ones. (they want a quick
read)

Keep your comments to the point and use respect when commenting. This is
public record and reflects on you as well as the BBP. Don't overload them
with suggestions. Keep in mind that this is something that has to be worked
out with other countries also e.g. The Caribbean, Mexico and Canada.

Make your comment in Word and then run it through spell checker prior to
sending or printing. (cut and paste)

We suggest the following items as comments. Please put into your own words
and add other comments as you feel would help. Again, keep it short.

(1) That you are concerned about the safety of the country however, the plan
they are suggesting just will not work because of logistics involved.

(2) That in Mexico, finding a working telephone is sometimes very difficult.
To find an Internet connection is all but impossible and is not available at
International airports. And to receive a reply via any medium for
permission to enter the US in a foreign country prior to departure is not
possible.

(3) Mexico's DGAC has communications but there are a lot of reasons why
messages get dropped. This includes power outages, phone lines down,
offices closed, officials not available, etc. The only positive way to get
a message to the US is via satellite phone, (which very few have) cell
phone which don't always have service in the required area, or VHF radio
from an aircraft when within 100+- miles of the border.

(4) That private aircraft are not scheduled airlines or charters. We are
adversely affected by weather, winds aloft, passenger personal needs, etc.

(5) That the proposed contact fees to be charged by Homeland Security will
greatly increase the cost of flying International.

(6) That Customs already has a procedure in place regarding advance notice,
checking passports, etc. of all arriving passengers, and has physical force
and facilities to detain any person that they feel should not be allowed to
enter the US.

(7) That Homeland Security contact and work with the Baja Bush Pilots to
serve as a spokesman for those that fly in and out of Mexico in an effort to
help creating a workable situation.

Don't copy your response to the BBP as it will just overload our e-mail. It
will be public record as to who responded and what was said.

Or, you can submit your comment via regular mail. If you respond by mail,
they will type it into public record:

Border Security Regulations Branch
Office of International Trade
US Customs and Border Protection
1300 Pennsylvania Ave, NW. (Mint Annex)
Washington, DC, 20220

And, a copy to your Senator(s) in your state is critical. Do your homework
to find their address.

And, one more interesting thing. When talking to Homeland Security, they
did not know how we got such a jump on this issue. They indicate that they
just published this proposal today. Thanks to many sources including a few
members, we were able to get a jump on this one.

____________________________

Alert 3 (9/19/07)
Our comments to Homeland Security

In two conversations with Homeland security yesterday and one this morning,
it was indicated that all comments posted will, because of the large level
of comments, be posted within 48 hours of our posting. This is unusual, as
comments are not normally posted until the closing of comments or, after
November 19 in this case. And, it was indicated a proposed rule change
normally generates about 30 comments over a 60-day period. They have
received over 30 for this change in the first day. If you have not done so,
put together your statement and send it in.

____________________________

Alert 4 (9/20/07)
206 docket responses in less than two days

We just got off the phone with Homeland Security who indicated that the
comment response to USCBP-2007-0064 is overwhelming. In looking at the
comment list and doing some spot-checking, it looks like about half the
people who have responded are BBP members.

If you have posted, thank you very much. If not, please make your feelings
known. The only way we can beat this is with comments followed by
constructive meetings in DC.

Don't put off posting your feelings. We need your comments.
____________________________
Alert 5 (9/29/07)
Info required to get permission for flight

I am not sure that everyone understands what the potential challange we will
face if rule 0064 is put into effect.

This is just one page of 64. And it gets worse.

In section 122.1 (d), the following rule will be for aircraft departing the
US. And please note, after submitting this information via electronic
means, you must wait to be contacted by Homeland Security to be given
permission to depart or (take-off) And their solution for notification for
both going down and coming back is that if there is no electronic means of
sending or receiving this information, just fly somewhere else where there
is.


It is critical that all respond to this proposed rule. Having trouble doing
it. Call the office at 480 730 3250. And, we find that it works better if
you type your response in Word and cut and paste into the comment section on
the USCBP site.

See step by step insturctions on where to find the comment section on two
posts down.

(1) General requirement. The private aircraft pilot is responsiblefor
ensuring that information regarding private aircraft departing the United
States, and manifest data for all individuals onboard the aircraft is
timely transmitted to CBP. The pilot is responsible for submitting this
information, but may authorize another party to submit the information on
their behalf. All data must be transmitted to CBP by means of an electronic
data interchange system approved by CBP, and must set forth the information
specified in paragraph (C3). All data pertaining to the aircraft, and all
individuals on board the aircraft must be transmitted at the same time.

(2) Time for submission. The private aircraft pilot must transmit the
electronic data required under paragraphs (c)(3) and (c)(4) of this section
to CBP no later than 60 minutes prior to departing the United States.

(3) Manifest data required. For private aircraft departing the United States
the following identifying information for all individuals onboard the
aircraft must be submitted:

(i) Full name of all individuals onboard the aircraft (last, first, and, if
available, middle);
(ii) Date of birth;
(iii) Gender (F=female; M=male);
(iv) Citizenship;
(v) Country of residence;
(vi) Status on board the aircraft;
(vii) Travel document type (e.g. P=passport; A=alien registration card);
(viii) Passport number, if a passport is required, or approved DHS travel
document;
(ix) Passport/Travel document country of issuance, if such a document is
required;
(x) Passport/Travel document expiration date, if such a document is
required;
(xi) Alien registration number, where applicable;
(xii). Address while in the United States (number and street, city, state,
and zip code).
(xiii) Redress number, if available.

(4) Notice of Departure information. For private aircraft departing the
United States, the following departure information must be submitted:
(i) Aircraft registration number;
(ii) Type of Aircraft;
(iii) Call sign (if available);
(iv) Decal number;
(v) Place of last departure;
(vi) Date of aircraft departure;
(vii) Estimated time of departure;
(viii) Estimated time and location of crossing U.S. border/coastline;
(ix) Name of intended foreign airport of first landing;
(x) Owner/Lessee´s name (last, first, and, if available, middle);
(xi) Owner/Lessee´s street address (number and street, city, state, zip
code, country, telephone no., fax no., and e-mail address);
(xii) Pilot/Private aircraft pilot name (last, first and, if available,
middle);
(xiii) Pilot license number;
(xiv) Pilot street address (number and street, city, state, zip code,
country, telephone no., fax no., and e-mail address);
(xv) Country of issuance of pilot´s license;
(xvi) Operator name (last, first, and if available, middle):
(xvii) Operator street address (number and street, city, state, zip code,
country, telephone no., fax no., and e-mail address);
(xviii) 24-hour Point of contact (e.g., broker, dispatcher, repair shop)
name and phone number;
(xix) Transponder code (beacon number);
(xx) Color;
(xxi) Complete itinerary (intended foreign airport destinations for 24 hours
following departure)

(5) Permission to depart. Prior to departure from the foreign port or place,
the pilot of a private aircraft must receive a message from DHS approving
departure for the United States, or following any instructions contained
therein prior to departure.

Then to return, the same rules, plus more, apply.





"AirSafetyPatriot" > wrote in message
...
> FAA ranks near bottom in Government employee morale
>
> http://bestplacestowork.org/BPTW/rankings/
>
> http://bestplacestowork.org/BPTW/rankings/agency.php?code=TD00&q=scores_large
>
> Pay particular attention to the employee satisfaction scores involving
> "White" employees and "African-American" employees
> and people over 40 in the Federal Aviation Administration.
>
> The FAA ranks near the bottom in almost every category in Federal Service
> unless you are Black. As an ex-FAA employee I know why. They treat
> critical employees like controllers and technicians like **** while they
> "Kiss the Black Ass" and cater to diversity conferences at resort casinos.
>
> Would it not make sense that a Government agency responsible for millions
> of lives EVERY ****ING DAY should rank near the top?
>
> Should a Government agency that is responsible for BILLIONS of revenue
> EACH day be near the TOP or BOTTOM?
>
> Why are minorities so much more happy in the FAA?? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm???
>
> Why is Diversity and "Kissing the Black Ass" more important now in the
> Federal AVIATION Administration?
>
> Anybody got an answer?
>
> DOT and FAA rank near bottom
>
> "Kissing the Black Ass" is coming at an extremely high price and at the
> risk of millions of the flying public.
>
> Unhappy FAA Employee=Delays=Aluminum Shower=Death
>
> http://bestplacestowork.org/BPTW/rankings/agency.php?code=TD03&q=scores_subcomponent
>

"AirSafetyPatriot" > wrote in message
...
> FAA ranks near bottom in Government employee morale
<blah blah blah>


No wonder - if they had to put up with you on a daily basis...

I bet moral got better after you got ****-canned.

So, when are you going to do something about your drinking problem?
(The only one you are fooling is yourself.)

--
Geoff
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate.

"Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" <The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com> wrote in message
...
> "AirSafetyPatriot" > wrote in message
> ...
>> FAA ranks near bottom in Government employee morale
> <blah blah blah>
>
>
> No wonder - if they had to put up with you on a daily basis...
>
> I bet moral got better after you got ****-canned.
>
> So, when are you going to do something about your drinking problem?
> (The only one you are fooling is yourself.)

What? Because he pours it down his forehead?

[slobber]

Matt Barrow wrote:
> "Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" <The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com> wrote in message
> ...
>> "AirSafetyPatriot" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> FAA ranks near bottom in Government employee morale
>> <blah blah blah>
>>
>>
>> No wonder - if they had to put up with you on a daily basis...
>>
>> I bet moral got better after you got ****-canned.
>>
>> So, when are you going to do something about your drinking problem?
>> (The only one you are fooling is yourself.)
>
> What? Because he pours it down his forehead?
>
> [slobber]
>
>

Yea "Moral" got better,,,DumbAss
BTW, I do not drink only expose FACTS
Facts that I am sure are beyond your pea brain capability to
comprehend.
So...Did ya ride the short bus and lick the windows?
Government employee perhaps?

AirSafetyPatriot > wrote in
:

> Matt Barrow wrote:
>> "Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" <The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com> wrote in
>> message ...
>>> "AirSafetyPatriot" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> FAA ranks near bottom in Government employee morale
>>> <blah blah blah>
>>>
>>>
>>> No wonder - if they had to put up with you on a daily basis...
>>>
>>> I bet moral got better after you got ****-canned.
>>>
>>> So, when are you going to do something about your drinking problem?
>>> (The only one you are fooling is yourself.)
>>
>> What? Because he pours it down his forehead?
>>
>> [slobber]
>>
>>
>
> Yea "Moral" got better,,,DumbAss
> BTW, I do not drink only expose FACTS
> Facts that I am sure are beyond your pea brain capability to
> comprehend.
> So...Did ya ride the short bus and lick the windows?
> Government employee perhaps?
>
>

You figure you're some sort of Patriot missile sort of a thing?

Well, rthe pointy head will surely help with this illusion..


Bertie (ok lame, but I'm tired, goddamit!)

"AirSafetyPatriot" > wrote in message
...
> Matt Barrow wrote:

>>
>> What? Because he pours it down his forehead?
>>
>> [slobber]
>
> Yea "Moral" got better,,,DumbAss
> BTW, I do not drink only expose FACTS
> Facts that I am sure are beyond your pea brain capability to comprehend.
> So...Did ya ride the short bus and lick the windows?
> Government employee perhaps?
\
Suck my self-employed cock, loser.
[plonk]